The Judicial Accountability 10 Question Challenge

Under the prior post, I had an anonymous commenter bring up a point for the 3rd or 4th time. Aside from bringing up new information about a Judicial Accountability weblog, for a third or fourth time, it's crap.

There is already a blog dedicated to amendment e check out amendment-e.blogspot.com AND ONCE AGAIN I will say.... This is about AMENDMENT E, NOT bill Stegmeier. You guys look like a bunch of kids scrambling around to discredit the neighborhood kid who is gonna tell your parents about something you did. Why not be constructive? Why not offer an actual debate instead of all this Bill Bashing. Remember there are 46,800 south Dakotans who think this law is needed, so stop and think about who you are also bashing...AND GROW UP!!

As noted, there is a weblog which was created on the heels of the new one that was created to oppose the measure. Progressive on the Prairie and I even get a plug on it, although they left off the links. From the only post on the blog so far:

These procedures slap the face of the people who respect and count on HONEST AND OPEN government. Which includes EVERYONE!! Bloggers like South dakota war college and Progressive on the Prairie have come out of the wood work to SLAM Amendment E. Their efforts are mostly focused on the man who funded the effort but they ignore the 46,800 people who have signed their name to put the issue up for public vote. This Blog is intended for ALL to post their opinions.

(And your little dog too!) It might be easier to take this blog with any degree of seriousness if the author wasn't anonymous, and it's other posts weren't posts back to the first post.

But back to Anonymous' comments about the criticism being about Bill Stegmeier. If "anon" hasn't noticed, many of the posts that I and others have written on have been about the measure itself.

The fact that Bill has such radical views such as the IRS being illegal and that the US Government blew up the trade towers on 9/11 is an added bonus to writing about a measure that advocates throwing out a form of government which has served our nation for over 200 years.

But am I being a little bit harsh? It could be I'm just crabby after my weekend commute.

Just because I try to be unequivocably fair, I'll give the JAILers their opportunity at the South Dakota War College. In an effort to clear the air, I'll extend an olive branch and offer the opportunity for Bill to explain his views on government and the Judicial Accountability movement.

If the JAILers will agree to it, I'll offer one of my 10 questions with... to Bill Stegmeier.

What does he have to do to get the opportunity to be featured at the SDWC with no editorial comment from myself (excepting the slander of others). It's simple. I'll send him ten questions. And he sends me the answers to those questions.

And that's all ten of them. Unlike the legislative hearing, he can't refuse to answer the ones he doesn't like. But, pursuant to the request he had of legislators, the questions will be in writing.

What will the topics be? I'm going to ask Bill about the JAIL measure and his views on government. Same format as I've done for others. Everything he's written or has been written about himself and JAIL is fair game.

If he wants to accept the challenge, all he needs to do is to drop me a note, and give me a day or so to compose them. And then he can have a week to get them back to me.

If he can stand the light of day being shined upon the Judicial Accountability movement in South Dakota, that is.