That's what the people get for imposing a tax, I guess.

By -
Senate Joint Resolution 15 has just been introduced by several legislators - I suspect in response to this last years' tobacco tax - to force the citizenry to mave to meet a 2/3rds threshold of support to pass a new tax, just like the legislature is required to.
A JOINT RESOLUTION, Proposing and submitting to the electors at the next general election amendments to Article XI of the Constitution of the State of South Dakota, relating to the vote required to impose or increase taxes.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE SENATE OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA, THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES CONCURRING THEREIN:
Section 1. That at the next general election held in the state, the following amendment to Article XI, section 14 of the Constitution of the State of South Dakota, as set forth in section 2 of this Joint Resolution, which is hereby agreed to, shall be submitted to the electors of the state for approval.
Section 2. That Article XI, section 14 of the Constitution of the State of South Dakota, be amended to read as follows:
§ 14. The rate of taxation imposed by the State of South Dakota in regard to any tax may not be increased and no new tax may be imposed by the State of South Dakota unless by consent of the people by exercise of their right of a two-thirds vote of the voters voting on an initiative or by a two-thirds vote of all the members elect of each branch of the Legislature.
You can read it here.

I'm a little tossed on it, as I darn well vote against every tax that's put to a vote (especially any involving income taxes). But the measure skates precariously close to infringing on the right of the people to make a decision of the whole.

I mean, doesn't the majority rule? Legislators are as fallible as the rest of us, but if 51% of the people themselves say tax us (and god only knows why they would) shouldn't that be sufficient?

I'm going to noodle on this one..

Comments

Anonymous said…
Shouldn't this measure require a 2/3rds majority to pass?
9:56 PM
Anonymous said…
good buy democracy,,,super majority means--MINORITY RULE--

Requireing two thirds means one third plus one vote stops anything.

33.35% can rule 66.65%
34 rule 66 and so forth

very bad bill !!!!
6:49 AM
Anonymous said…
I don't think Garry Moore really cares what the voters in his district think. He introduces a bill to remove the tobacco tax even though it received over 61% in his district and 61% statewide. People in Yankton have got to be getting tired of this guy only looking out for his personal interests (tobacco wholesaler.)
8:32 AM
Anonymous said…
Wouldn't the bill work both ways if it passes? Take the cell phone tax initiative, wouldn't that then need 2/3rds to repeal a tax the same way the legislature works?
8:35 AM
Anonymous said…
The sponsors are lackies of the liqour/tobacco interests. I wouldn't be surprised if this is the product of the lobbists representing the two merchants of death in South Dakota, alcohol and tobacco.
6:06 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A note from Benedict Ar... Sorry. A note from Stan Adelstein why he thinks you should vote Democrat this year.

By -
Image
(Click on letter to enlarge) And while it may not be printed at taxpayer expense, I don't see a disclaimer, either. When they hold the special session (supposedly at the end of November) , since he's left them already, I think his colleagues should expel him from the caucus. Sure. At that point it's only going to be symbolic. But since he's already said he's running again in the near future, sometimes symbolism is enough.
Read more

Corson County information on Klaudt Rape Charges

By -
Here's some of the information on the Corson County Charges: COUNT I That on or about December of 2005, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration with his foster daughter, A.M., through the use of force or coercion; and as to COUNT II That on or about July or August of 2006, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration with his foster daughter, A.M., through the use of force or coercion; and as to COUNT III That on or about July or August of 2006, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration, separate and distinct from the act alleged in Count II, with
Read more

It's about health, not potential promiscuity.

By -
As the only South Dakota blogger out with 5 daughters, I feel I need to weigh in on the whole discussion that's occurring with regards to the HPV vaccine, and Governor Rounds' proposal to make it available. My family (including my three oldest girls) watched my mom, their grandmother, succumb slowly and painfully to cancer which spread throughout her body. If a similar fate from a different type of cancer was preventable through a simple shot, why wouldn't anyone advocate for it? At the age most of my kids are going to be getting it, they're still playing with barbies, and negative influences such as most of the programming on MTV, and other assorted trashy television is verboten in my house. All they're going to know about this vaccination is that it's a shot, just like for teatnus or measles. They'll go "Ow, I don't want a shot," and that will be it. Just another mark on their vaccination record. One check box for DPT, one for HPV, and so on
Read more