Could the School Funding lawsuit get smashed soon? Let's hope so, for taxpayers' sake
The Argus Leader is writing this morning that a judge is going to rule of the legality of spending taxpayer dollars to sue taxpayers (via the state) for more taxpayer dollars. All for the sake of the taxpayer:
Read it all here.A judge's ruling on a new lawsuit could kill dozens of South Dakota school districts' funding fight and cost individual board members money.
Board members from three South Dakota school districts have asked a judge to rule that their tax-dollar pledges to support a lawsuit against the state were legal.and...
Attorney General Larry Long said it's illegal for school districts to sue the state and has sought to audit the coalition to determine which districts have given how much money.
Comments
I am being snide by the way.
I do believe that the funding needs changes but come on!! How many books of matches do they need to throw money up in smoke?
Larry Long you are great, 8:33 has been hanging with the legalize dope crowd.
Long and Rounds like getting elected, take their state government paychecks (for Rounds family members as well) but they don't want to do their jobs.
North Dakota went through a similar lawsuit. Y'know what happened? ND realized that maybe they weren't paying schools enough money and decided to increase funding. And then the lawsuit was dropped.
So why are Rounds and Long sticking their heads in the sand?
Guess that is the case for me trying to type on this page of the blog.
Sorry for all the blunders. I have noticed that my cursor has a hesitation when trying to type thou?? Whats with that??
Isn't it amazing that people can overlook the many fiscal and social problems in our nation and instead zero in on personal issues?
Isn't it amazing that people use their interpretations of the Bible as an excuse to try and dominate a nation that guarantees Freedom of Religion?
Isn't it amazing that the people who preach about morals will twist the truth and try to skirt the law in order to win?
Isn't it amazing that the side that had the most resources in both money and volunteers only pulled in 44 percent of the votes?
Isn't it amazing that the majority of South Dakotans had the good sense to vote down the ban?
Isn't it amazing that sometimes they really do?
Isn't amazing that when the do, they usually LOSE, cause the majority of the people in our democracy don't agree with them?
Plato's argument against democracy.
Why should ten fools overrule one wise man?