Just a comment... Traffic is still high after the election season

By -
As of today, My post-election December 20th has higher traffic than the entire pre-election month of September did, right at about 18,000 or more.

I'm not sure, but I think I might actually keep pace with October and November hitting above 25,000 visitors. (yeah!)

I'm also noticing my slowest days (Sundays) keep trending higher and higher. This actually leads me to believe that my readership continues to grow. That's really surprising, since most websites like this tend to drop off after the election cycle.

Thanks for your continued support.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Get used to the increase in numbers PP. The people of South Dakota are starting to realize more and more they cannot rely on the drive by media for information and the younger generation (myself being 23) turn to the blogs for the correct information.

Our generation has grown up with the lies of the media and we don't turn to KELO or Argus anymore!!

Keep up the great posts and I will keep promoting this site and other conservative blogs for people to find the truth about what is happening in politics!
9:01 AM
Anonymous said…
PP blogs will continue to grow and worthless papers like the Aberdeen Snooze will decrease. We are getting tired of reading how wonderful Liberals are and how bad Conservatives are.

Give me the truth and I will make my own decisions.

I tell all my friends to read and post at your site.

Thank all of you bloggers.

Merry Christmas!
9:18 AM
Anonymous said…
Not so fast, 9:01 and :18. The reason PP's blog is picking up is that he has been doing a superb job of making his pages interesting, provocative and inclusive. He's not a right-wing headbanger, and is rarely (if ever) abusive to posters with points of view different from his own.

For that reason, a lot of Moderates, Independents and yes, even some of us Lefties have been checking in here and joining the conversation.

Simply put, PP's blog is growing because he is serving a broad political spectrum well, in a timely way, with a nose for news, and a tolerant attitude.

I salute you, PP. Keep up the good work.
10:02 AM
Anonymous said…
Your Sundays are slow because you post much less on Saturdays & Sundays. Nothing new to read = fewer hits.
5:52 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A note from Benedict Ar... Sorry. A note from Stan Adelstein why he thinks you should vote Democrat this year.

By -
Image
(Click on letter to enlarge) And while it may not be printed at taxpayer expense, I don't see a disclaimer, either. When they hold the special session (supposedly at the end of November) , since he's left them already, I think his colleagues should expel him from the caucus. Sure. At that point it's only going to be symbolic. But since he's already said he's running again in the near future, sometimes symbolism is enough.
Read more

Corson County information on Klaudt Rape Charges

By -
Here's some of the information on the Corson County Charges: COUNT I That on or about December of 2005, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration with his foster daughter, A.M., through the use of force or coercion; and as to COUNT II That on or about July or August of 2006, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration with his foster daughter, A.M., through the use of force or coercion; and as to COUNT III That on or about July or August of 2006, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration, separate and distinct from the act alleged in Count II, with
Read more

It's about health, not potential promiscuity.

By -
As the only South Dakota blogger out with 5 daughters, I feel I need to weigh in on the whole discussion that's occurring with regards to the HPV vaccine, and Governor Rounds' proposal to make it available. My family (including my three oldest girls) watched my mom, their grandmother, succumb slowly and painfully to cancer which spread throughout her body. If a similar fate from a different type of cancer was preventable through a simple shot, why wouldn't anyone advocate for it? At the age most of my kids are going to be getting it, they're still playing with barbies, and negative influences such as most of the programming on MTV, and other assorted trashy television is verboten in my house. All they're going to know about this vaccination is that it's a shot, just like for teatnus or measles. They'll go "Ow, I don't want a shot," and that will be it. Just another mark on their vaccination record. One check box for DPT, one for HPV, and so on
Read more