Mitchell Republic: Abortion, 150% and School Enrollment Numbers are coming back in 2008

By -
The Mitchell Daily Republic has a story from that area's legislators noting that Abortion, the 150% rule and School Enrollment Numbers are issues that are all coming back in 2008.

The issue of educational funding was another hot button issue. Sen. Ed Olson, R-Mitchell, said the debate on educational funding highlighted a philosophical difference between the Senate and the House of Representatives.

“They’re far more conservative than we are,” he said. “They don’t really look as much as we do as education being an investment.”

and...

“It is going to come back,” said Rep. Lance Carson, R-Mitchell. “As long as the Legislature is around, there will be some kind of abortion bill.”

After voters shot down an abortion ban in November, HB 1293 was introduced. The bill, which made exceptions for rape, incest and the health of the mother, was passed by the House but was deferred to the 41st day by the Senate State Affairs Committee, effectively killing the plan.

Olson said he fielded many questions about the continuing attempt to ban abortions in South Dakota.

“I was asked why we were dealing with this issue after the voters said they wanted a break on it,” he said. “I think you can make a case that they wanted the exceptions and that’s what the bill did. I’m not sure they said they want a break.”

Read it all here.

(You notice no one mentions car seats after the shellacking it took yesterday?)

Comments

Anonymous said…
In my humble opinion, this district is represented by three arrogant boobs.
11:07 PM
Anonymous said…
Well, if the $150 rule is back, I hope it's accompanied by some good HONEST property tax reform. Last year's bill was not it (except maybe for the sponsors). It would have raised our taxes even though the spin said it wouldn't.
7:43 AM
Anonymous said…
Nonnie,
173 was as close to revenue neutral as you can get. It raised some people's taxes and it cut some people's taxes. In taxes, shift happens!
10:14 AM
Anonymous said…
Rep. Carson: the guy who sponsored nothing, said nothing, and did nothing this term. He's the prototype of a back-bencher. Don't count on him to get the job done.
1:23 PM
Anonymous said…
10:14 anon. Spoken by one who stood to benefit by the repeal or one of the sponsors, same deal. If you want property tax reform, then get property tax reform. If it raises my taxes, sorry, it's not reform.

Property owners are the go to people when anything needs more money - schools, townships, counties, you name it. Well, just maybe that well is dry and it's time to look at digging another one!
1:32 PM
Anonymous said…
nonnie said;

"If it raises my taxes, sorry, it's not reform."

what if your taxes did not go up as much as everyone elses ?

what county/school district you live in nonnie ?
12:07 AM
Anonymous said…
1:23 Says Carson sponsored nothing and did nothing this term. Let's see, he is a freshman, serving on appropriations. Those on appropriations are the hardest workers out there, working long hours in the usually boring committee.

As for sponsoring no bills, why does a freshman have to sponsor anything? They are learning, and a good legislator doesn't just throw a bill in so they can say "I sponsored something so I must be doing something". With over 500 bills out there they don't need more crap in the mix.
5:12 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A note from Benedict Ar... Sorry. A note from Stan Adelstein why he thinks you should vote Democrat this year.

By -
Image
(Click on letter to enlarge) And while it may not be printed at taxpayer expense, I don't see a disclaimer, either. When they hold the special session (supposedly at the end of November) , since he's left them already, I think his colleagues should expel him from the caucus. Sure. At that point it's only going to be symbolic. But since he's already said he's running again in the near future, sometimes symbolism is enough.
Read more

Corson County information on Klaudt Rape Charges

By -
Here's some of the information on the Corson County Charges: COUNT I That on or about December of 2005, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration with his foster daughter, A.M., through the use of force or coercion; and as to COUNT II That on or about July or August of 2006, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration with his foster daughter, A.M., through the use of force or coercion; and as to COUNT III That on or about July or August of 2006, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration, separate and distinct from the act alleged in Count II, with
Read more

It's about health, not potential promiscuity.

By -
As the only South Dakota blogger out with 5 daughters, I feel I need to weigh in on the whole discussion that's occurring with regards to the HPV vaccine, and Governor Rounds' proposal to make it available. My family (including my three oldest girls) watched my mom, their grandmother, succumb slowly and painfully to cancer which spread throughout her body. If a similar fate from a different type of cancer was preventable through a simple shot, why wouldn't anyone advocate for it? At the age most of my kids are going to be getting it, they're still playing with barbies, and negative influences such as most of the programming on MTV, and other assorted trashy television is verboten in my house. All they're going to know about this vaccination is that it's a shot, just like for teatnus or measles. They'll go "Ow, I don't want a shot," and that will be it. Just another mark on their vaccination record. One check box for DPT, one for HPV, and so on
Read more