As the only South Dakota blogger out with 5 daughters, I feel I need to weigh in on the whole discussion that's occurring with regards to the HPV vaccine, and Governor Rounds' proposal to make it available. My family (including my three oldest girls) watched my mom, their grandmother, succumb slowly and painfully to cancer which spread throughout her body. If a similar fate from a different type of cancer was preventable through a simple shot, why wouldn't anyone advocate for it? At the age most of my kids are going to be getting it, they're still playing with barbies, and negative influences such as most of the programming on MTV, and other assorted trashy television is verboten in my house. All they're going to know about this vaccination is that it's a shot, just like for teatnus or measles. They'll go "Ow, I don't want a shot," and that will be it. Just another mark on their vaccination record. One check box for DPT, one for HPV, and so on...
Comments
1) You get any answer?
2) You get a complete answer to all 10 questions?
3) You get an answer within the 7 day timeframe?
4) You get an answer that was not written by Branson, Zerman and Russell out of California?
My guesses:
1) You will get something
2) It will be complete in that there will be 10 "answers" but they may have nothing to do with the question asked
3) It will not be within 7 days
4) It will be written by the California Shell Game people, with Bonnie probably taking the lead
But if J.A.I.L./Amendment E passes, that will change because "All allegations in the complaint shall be liberally construed in favor of the complainant."
So judges and others who have complaints filed against them will be PRESUMED GUILTY unless they prove to the Special Grand Jury they are not.
Cute, huh?