Argus Leader weighs in on Primary races

By -
In an article today, the Sioux Falls Argus Leader touches on a few of the legislative contests in an article trying to infer that many of them are abortion driven:
Alvine vs. Abdallah

Alvine said he doesn't think the Legislature is the best place to set complex medical policies - "It's kind of trying to practice medicine," he said - but he said abortion isn't what prompted his candidacy. He has been involved in policy-making at many levels of his profession, he said, and he thinks "a medical voice on the Senate floor" could be valuable in many debates.

"I'm 67, and if I don't do it now, when would I do it?" Alvine said. "It's now or never."

Schwiesow vs. Adelstein

Republican Sen. Stan Adelstein, who opposed the ban last session, faces Elli Schwiesow, a local and state GOP activist who supports the ban lawmakers passed. Except when an abortion is performed to save a pregnant woman's life, any doctor who performs the procedure can be charged with a felony.

Schwiesow has said she couldn't support further exceptions.

Adelstein has said several times he won't support abortion restrictions that don't include exceptions for victims of rape and incest and to protect the health of a pregnant woman.

Hauge vs. Kooistra

A Garretson Republican, whose 2004 primary opponent said an abortion vote spurred the contest, has a primary race again this year, but abortion seems to be a low-level issue.

Sen. Clarence Kooistra, who voted against an abortion ban in 2004 and again in 2006, said he is running on an education-based platform. He said he could be in line to be one of the leaders of the Senate Education Committee if re-elected. That could be an important spot for his district when a state task force returns a report late this year that could recommend school consolidations and changes in the school-aid formula.

"We need to have input into what happens to the recommendations from that task force, and I expect consolidation to be part of it," Kooistra said.

Arlen Hauge of Canistota is challenging Kooistra for the GOP nomination. Hauge said he's running because he's had a successful business career and wants to be part of discussions that could shape the future of South Dakota.
Read it all here, and more.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A note from Benedict Ar... Sorry. A note from Stan Adelstein why he thinks you should vote Democrat this year.

By -
Image
(Click on letter to enlarge) And while it may not be printed at taxpayer expense, I don't see a disclaimer, either. When they hold the special session (supposedly at the end of November) , since he's left them already, I think his colleagues should expel him from the caucus. Sure. At that point it's only going to be symbolic. But since he's already said he's running again in the near future, sometimes symbolism is enough.
Read more

Corson County information on Klaudt Rape Charges

By -
Here's some of the information on the Corson County Charges: COUNT I That on or about December of 2005, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration with his foster daughter, A.M., through the use of force or coercion; and as to COUNT II That on or about July or August of 2006, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration with his foster daughter, A.M., through the use of force or coercion; and as to COUNT III That on or about July or August of 2006, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration, separate and distinct from the act alleged in Count II, with
Read more

It's about health, not potential promiscuity.

By -
As the only South Dakota blogger out with 5 daughters, I feel I need to weigh in on the whole discussion that's occurring with regards to the HPV vaccine, and Governor Rounds' proposal to make it available. My family (including my three oldest girls) watched my mom, their grandmother, succumb slowly and painfully to cancer which spread throughout her body. If a similar fate from a different type of cancer was preventable through a simple shot, why wouldn't anyone advocate for it? At the age most of my kids are going to be getting it, they're still playing with barbies, and negative influences such as most of the programming on MTV, and other assorted trashy television is verboten in my house. All they're going to know about this vaccination is that it's a shot, just like for teatnus or measles. They'll go "Ow, I don't want a shot," and that will be it. Just another mark on their vaccination record. One check box for DPT, one for HPV, and so on
Read more