I thought he was dead....... John Timmer back talking about term limits to the Constitutional Revision Commission

By -
This was kind of an "Abe Vigoda" moment in South Dakota politics. Just like the Hollywood actor that many thought had passed away, but remained alive, just not very active; former congressional candidate John Timmer appeared before the constitutional revision commission to argue against removing term limits in this AP article appearing in the Rapid City Journal.
The man who led the charge to impose term limits on state lawmakers and other state elected officials says that despite rumors, he still believes those limits are worthwhile.

John Timmer of Sioux Falls appeared before a special state commission this past week to argue against any effort to repeal term limits. Timmer, a former lawmaker, led the campaign that passed a 1992 state constitutional amendment imposing term limits on legislators and other officials.

Timmer said there have been rumors that he now opposes term limits. Those rumors are false, he said.

"I still strongly believe in term limits," Timmer told the Constitutional Revision Commission, which is looking at proposed changes in provisions and laws that deal with the legislature.

The commission has discussed possible changes in legislative term limits, but no recommendation will be made until after a public hearing in Sioux Falls in late November.
Read the whole article here. And scratch your head and wonder where he had gotten off to. John Timmer has remained one of the lowest profile congressional challengers of recent history, but it is a natural for him to appear on this topic - one that may have earned him some emnity from his colleagues, but did propel him into statewide focus.

Comments

Anonymous said…
What term limits? They simply bounce back and forth from House to Senate and back again. Should be maybe three terms instead of two and then they have to sit out from either the House or Senate for one or two terms before they can run again. That would be true term limits.
7:09 AM
Anonymous said…
Term limits or not, Gordon Pederson will keep coming back until he's 100.
8:24 AM
Anonymous said…
Term limits are doing what they were intended to do. The limits have allowed for more competitive and responsive government. P.S. Gordon will be term limited out in 2008.
10:16 AM
Anonymous said…
No, John is not dead, however he has just about killed the SD legisalture with his crackpot idea.
2:06 PM
Anonymous said…
As a former legislator, I still think they are a good idea. PS, I think Gordon IS 100!
12:32 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A note from Benedict Ar... Sorry. A note from Stan Adelstein why he thinks you should vote Democrat this year.

By -
Image
(Click on letter to enlarge) And while it may not be printed at taxpayer expense, I don't see a disclaimer, either. When they hold the special session (supposedly at the end of November) , since he's left them already, I think his colleagues should expel him from the caucus. Sure. At that point it's only going to be symbolic. But since he's already said he's running again in the near future, sometimes symbolism is enough.
Read more

Corson County information on Klaudt Rape Charges

By -
Here's some of the information on the Corson County Charges: COUNT I That on or about December of 2005, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration with his foster daughter, A.M., through the use of force or coercion; and as to COUNT II That on or about July or August of 2006, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration with his foster daughter, A.M., through the use of force or coercion; and as to COUNT III That on or about July or August of 2006, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration, separate and distinct from the act alleged in Count II, with
Read more

It's about health, not potential promiscuity.

By -
As the only South Dakota blogger out with 5 daughters, I feel I need to weigh in on the whole discussion that's occurring with regards to the HPV vaccine, and Governor Rounds' proposal to make it available. My family (including my three oldest girls) watched my mom, their grandmother, succumb slowly and painfully to cancer which spread throughout her body. If a similar fate from a different type of cancer was preventable through a simple shot, why wouldn't anyone advocate for it? At the age most of my kids are going to be getting it, they're still playing with barbies, and negative influences such as most of the programming on MTV, and other assorted trashy television is verboten in my house. All they're going to know about this vaccination is that it's a shot, just like for teatnus or measles. They'll go "Ow, I don't want a shot," and that will be it. Just another mark on their vaccination record. One check box for DPT, one for HPV, and so on
Read more