Both sides have argued. Now we wait for the decision.

By -
Both Attorney General Larry Long and the Sutton legal team have made their arguments to the South Dakota Supreme Court. Now it's time for the waiting game to begin as we start the vigil waiting for a signal on whether the Sutton groping allegations can be resolved or not.

Check out the latest at Argus Leader.com:
In Wednesday’s filing, Long called Circuit Court Judge David Gienapp’s actions in stopping potential Senate hearings “truly extraordinary” and asked the Supreme Court to allow the proceedings to take place.

Long also argued that Gienapp doesn’t have the authority to stop the Senate from acting.

The Senate, Long wrote, “is unaware of any assignment by the chief justice to expand the circuit court’s jurisdiction beyond the Third Judicial Circuit.”

Long’s response came one day after Sutton’s lawyers contended the Senate has no constitutional authority to expel a member unless that person has been convicted of a serious crime. Sutton has not been charged or convicted of any crime.

Attorneys Michael Butler and Patrick Duffy also said the Senate can’t simply act to deprive voters of their elected representative without judicial oversight.

Duffy on Wednesday said there are fundamental differences in how both sides see the case.

“We’ve got two briefs; both say polar opposite views of the power of the Senate,” Duffy said. “We’ll wait to see what the court says, because that’s what the law is.”
Read it all here in the Argus Leader.

Comments

Anonymous said…
This would be a good time for us to join together and pray for our Supreme Court. We should pray that they think clearly, walk in integrity and ask for God's wisdom in deciding this important matter before our state.
7:30 PM
Anonymous said…
Yes.
10:58 PM
Anonymous said…
Considering the power and responsibility it holds, I would suggest we ALWAYS include the Supreme Court in our prayers.
12:13 AM
Anonymous said…
Was the Senate going to expel Sutton? I thought they were just going to hold a hearing to investigate the matter. After all, "the seriousness of the charge requires they investigate." It seems the court has already convicted him and determined he would be expelled.
1:32 AM
Anonymous said…
It’s my understanding that the Senate’s base argument is that they have the right to discipline one of its own. Of course, in order to reach that stage of the game they need to hold hearings on the matter. IMO, Sutton is as afraid of the hearings as he is of the possible outcome of them (expulsion). Makes me wonder what he’s hiding, because it seems to defy basic logic that anyone accused of such a thing wouldn’t embrace the opportunity to clear his name in public (and quickly), and move on for the sake of himself, his family, and the State of South Dakota.
6:51 AM
Anonymous said…
Tip

You should ask Sutton - his lawyers are the ones who cried foul over expulsion. That's their stated reason for asking Judge Gienapp to stop the hearing - because they read the law as saying the Senate has no right to expel Sutton.
11:06 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A note from Benedict Ar... Sorry. A note from Stan Adelstein why he thinks you should vote Democrat this year.

By -
Image
(Click on letter to enlarge) And while it may not be printed at taxpayer expense, I don't see a disclaimer, either. When they hold the special session (supposedly at the end of November) , since he's left them already, I think his colleagues should expel him from the caucus. Sure. At that point it's only going to be symbolic. But since he's already said he's running again in the near future, sometimes symbolism is enough.
Read more

Corson County information on Klaudt Rape Charges

By -
Here's some of the information on the Corson County Charges: COUNT I That on or about December of 2005, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration with his foster daughter, A.M., through the use of force or coercion; and as to COUNT II That on or about July or August of 2006, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration with his foster daughter, A.M., through the use of force or coercion; and as to COUNT III That on or about July or August of 2006, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration, separate and distinct from the act alleged in Count II, with
Read more

It's about health, not potential promiscuity.

By -
As the only South Dakota blogger out with 5 daughters, I feel I need to weigh in on the whole discussion that's occurring with regards to the HPV vaccine, and Governor Rounds' proposal to make it available. My family (including my three oldest girls) watched my mom, their grandmother, succumb slowly and painfully to cancer which spread throughout her body. If a similar fate from a different type of cancer was preventable through a simple shot, why wouldn't anyone advocate for it? At the age most of my kids are going to be getting it, they're still playing with barbies, and negative influences such as most of the programming on MTV, and other assorted trashy television is verboten in my house. All they're going to know about this vaccination is that it's a shot, just like for teatnus or measles. They'll go "Ow, I don't want a shot," and that will be it. Just another mark on their vaccination record. One check box for DPT, one for HPV, and so on
Read more