10q recap.

By -
Here's a good question for the attorneys out there as a postscript to the Judicial Accountability Measure 10 questions:
If a constitutional amendment directly amends one part of the constitution, but another one is affected and not amended, is the constitutional amendment void, unenforceable, or is the entire constitution modified to comply?
I did well on my LSAT, but never attended law school, so if someone would oblige me....

Comments

Anonymous said…
let me get this straight then. The egg came first?
10:25 PM
PP said…
Confusing, isn't it.

The amendment as presented modifies only a small, small part of the state constitution.

My question is - what about the rest that is contradicotry towards the amendment?
11:37 PM
Anonymous said…
The amendment itself says it would trump contrary provisions in state statute or the SD Constitution. Yet another thing that makes it so nefarious--they get to disregard existing law, and their law is supreme.
8:53 AM
Anonymous said…
Hello Power, welcome back to your rightful owners, the People...
Scary to the lawyers and special interest groups isn't it?
8:58 AM
Anonymous said…
Couldn't their law be meat lovers instead of supreme?
9:21 AM
Anonymous said…
you are cool
11:44 AM
Anonymous said…
Kook power. The rest of us like living under the rule of law. It looks to me like judges can lose their jobs just by having the kooks complaints construed against them (which the grand jury must do) even though they go to trial and are found innocent of wrong doing. I suggest that the people who vote for JAIL...if it passes, pay off the huge amounts the state will owe those who have had their constitutional rights violated by Amendment sleEzy rather than raising the tax rates on all...let those who erect that abusive system pay for it...oh, I forgot, they don't think that taxes are constitutional.
12:58 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A note from Benedict Ar... Sorry. A note from Stan Adelstein why he thinks you should vote Democrat this year.

By -
Image
(Click on letter to enlarge) And while it may not be printed at taxpayer expense, I don't see a disclaimer, either. When they hold the special session (supposedly at the end of November) , since he's left them already, I think his colleagues should expel him from the caucus. Sure. At that point it's only going to be symbolic. But since he's already said he's running again in the near future, sometimes symbolism is enough.
Read more

Corson County information on Klaudt Rape Charges

By -
Here's some of the information on the Corson County Charges: COUNT I That on or about December of 2005, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration with his foster daughter, A.M., through the use of force or coercion; and as to COUNT II That on or about July or August of 2006, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration with his foster daughter, A.M., through the use of force or coercion; and as to COUNT III That on or about July or August of 2006, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration, separate and distinct from the act alleged in Count II, with
Read more

It's about health, not potential promiscuity.

By -
As the only South Dakota blogger out with 5 daughters, I feel I need to weigh in on the whole discussion that's occurring with regards to the HPV vaccine, and Governor Rounds' proposal to make it available. My family (including my three oldest girls) watched my mom, their grandmother, succumb slowly and painfully to cancer which spread throughout her body. If a similar fate from a different type of cancer was preventable through a simple shot, why wouldn't anyone advocate for it? At the age most of my kids are going to be getting it, they're still playing with barbies, and negative influences such as most of the programming on MTV, and other assorted trashy television is verboten in my house. All they're going to know about this vaccination is that it's a shot, just like for teatnus or measles. They'll go "Ow, I don't want a shot," and that will be it. Just another mark on their vaccination record. One check box for DPT, one for HPV, and so on
Read more