Gilbertson kicks amendment E in the tail on it's way out the door

By -
Check out KELOland.com for comments from the Chief Justice as he made his State of the judiciary speech:
South Dakota Supreme Court Chief Justice David Gilbertson says voters did the right thing in November when they soundly trounced a measure that had been labeled "jail for judges."

and..

Gilbertson, in a speech today to a joint session of the Legislature, said approval of the measure would have brought "catastrophic results" for the judicial system.
Read that all here as Gilbertson sticks it to them one time. Interestingly enough, Bill Stegemeier isn't down for the county just yet. He was commenting on increased petition signature requirements over at the Argus Leader today...

Surprising support, though, comes from Bill Stegmeier of Tea, the prime backer of the judicial accountability amendment that failed on Nov. 7. Stegmeier and others paid for a Nevada company to organize the petition drive - but he's OK with any possible changes.

"South Dakota's probably the easiest state to get something on the ballot," he said. "I wouldn't have a problem with making it more difficult."

Read that all here. Not surprisingly, I disagree with Amendment E's proponent. I'm one person who disagrees with making it more difficult to get things on the ballot. Because it's making it tougher to initiate a measure - a higher hurdle that they have to cross.

If they can get the signatures, so be it. Let the ballot be longer.

Comments

Anonymous said…
The only reason to increase the number of signatures is to reduce citizen access to the ballot.

If there are concerns about improper signatures then give the Sec. of State enough money to actually review some percent of the signatures and eliminate fraudulent ones.
6:32 PM
Anonymous said…
I totally agree with Mr. Nemec. In other states I have lived in, the office that oversees elections has to check signatures for validity -- place of residence, etc. Candidates are checked to make sure they are in the right district, are registered in the right party (i.e. Schmidt in Rapid City). Even the person who collected/witnessed each page of signatures had to be "validated" or the all the signatures he or she collected were invalid, too. I don't think this inhibits the democratic process. But it does ensure that the process is untainted.
6:59 PM
Anonymous said…
If an organization has enough money to pay to gather 20,000 signatures, they have enough money to gather 40,000 or 60,000 or whatever the number. It will just cost those groups a little more.

But raising the signature requirements will seriously inhibit grassroots movements that don't have those resources.

As for the Secretary of State checking the validity....please name one initiative that wouldn't have been there with a thorough signature analysis. As far as I know, they all had plenty of names to spare if a percentage were thrown out.

And, by the way, not a single 'wacky' idea on the ballot passed. Give the voters some credit, and let them vote on whatever they want. Democracy can take care of the rest. (Can you imagine limiting our Legislators' ability to introduce bills to the floor? It's nonsense.)
10:01 PM
Anonymous said…
Anon 10:01.

Right on with your first two points.

I know of no measure on the last ballot that wouldn't have been there with a more in depth checking of signatures. But, checking a % of signatures would give crazies and sore losers like Leslee Unruh less room to bitch about something that made the ballot.

Unlike some I don't think the last ballot was too long. The voters did a pretty good job of turning back crazy stuff or stuff they didn't understand.
4:24 AM
Anonymous said…
That judge who gave Sutton an injunction should go to jail.
11:37 AM
Anonymous said…
I agree. lock up the judge and the lawyers and sutton.
8:55 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A note from Benedict Ar... Sorry. A note from Stan Adelstein why he thinks you should vote Democrat this year.

By -
Image
(Click on letter to enlarge) And while it may not be printed at taxpayer expense, I don't see a disclaimer, either. When they hold the special session (supposedly at the end of November) , since he's left them already, I think his colleagues should expel him from the caucus. Sure. At that point it's only going to be symbolic. But since he's already said he's running again in the near future, sometimes symbolism is enough.
Read more

Corson County information on Klaudt Rape Charges

By -
Here's some of the information on the Corson County Charges: COUNT I That on or about December of 2005, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration with his foster daughter, A.M., through the use of force or coercion; and as to COUNT II That on or about July or August of 2006, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration with his foster daughter, A.M., through the use of force or coercion; and as to COUNT III That on or about July or August of 2006, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration, separate and distinct from the act alleged in Count II, with...
Read more

It's about health, not potential promiscuity.

By -
As the only South Dakota blogger out with 5 daughters, I feel I need to weigh in on the whole discussion that's occurring with regards to the HPV vaccine, and Governor Rounds' proposal to make it available. My family (including my three oldest girls) watched my mom, their grandmother, succumb slowly and painfully to cancer which spread throughout her body. If a similar fate from a different type of cancer was preventable through a simple shot, why wouldn't anyone advocate for it? At the age most of my kids are going to be getting it, they're still playing with barbies, and negative influences such as most of the programming on MTV, and other assorted trashy television is verboten in my house. All they're going to know about this vaccination is that it's a shot, just like for teatnus or measles. They'll go "Ow, I don't want a shot," and that will be it. Just another mark on their vaccination record. One check box for DPT, one for HPV, and so on...
Read more