Senate says that you just can't stop them (judicially). But just in case, they'll get confirmation of it. is noting that the legislature is telling people that the Circuit Court can't push them around... Because they're the legislature. But just in case, they'll get a ruling from dad:
Attorney General Larry Long and the South Dakota Senate now says the Moody
County Circuit Court does not have judicial authority to stop the legislature from investigating one of it's members.

The order Sutton's lawyers filed Wednesday argues the investigative hearing scheduled to begin next week is outside the jurisdiction of any administrative, judicial, tribunal, corporation, board, or person. But today's filings say a legislative body does not fall under any of those categories.

The Senate's court filings today also say because of the clear division of the three branches of government, a judicial body cannot have authority over the
legislative body and cannot stop the law-making process while it's ongoing.

Read it all here. It's like a boulder rolling down the hill. I don't think anything is going to stop this inevitable hearing.


Anonymous said…
PP - have you misquoted KELO?

" ... stop the legislature from investigating one of it's members."

I have you have inaccurately quoted KELO because its reporters passed 5th grade English and understand the possessive form of "its" does NOT contain an apostrophe.
Anonymous said…
Hmmm. Separation of powers. Haven't we heard that topic before in the past year? It's great how Larry Long conveniently rolls out the argument to serve one interest, but completely ignores it for others.
Anonymous said…
Would you guys who worry about its vs it's give it up, please? I'm all for correct grammar and spelling too, but I'd much rather have a great idea with a misspelling than a terrible idea with no spelling errors. There are some things more important than others. I had a girlfriend who accomplished a lot of things in her life, but spelling was not her forte. Please look past the "it's" of this life!
Anonymous said…
"I have you have"

Get over it.
Anonymous said…
"It's great how Larry Long conveniently rolls out the argument to serve one interest, but completely ignores it for others."

That is what the law is all about - advance whatever interests serve your client; in this case, the Senate.
Anonymous said…
Here’s what I don’t get. First read this from the SD Constitution:

“ § 11. Legislators’ privilege from arrest–Freedom of debate. Senators and representatives shall, in all cases except treason, felony or breach of the peace, be privileged from arrest during the session of the Legislature, and in going to and returning from the same; and for words used in any speech or debate in either house, they shall not be questioned in any other place.”

Ok, so if a legislator is immune from arrest during session because his duties as a lawmaker are so important to the workings of the state, how is it that the Legisature itself would want to choose to distract itself from its lawmaking duties by accusing one of its members of things for which he has not yet been arrested and in any case COULD NOT BE arrested until the legislative session was over?

In other words, doesn't the legislature have better things to do while it's in session? Isn't that the reason § 11 is there in the first place? Just curious.
Anonymous said…
Nice try Bill,
It says a legislator can't be arrested "during" the session.

The idea is to make sure the elected official can be in Pierre during the session.

It does not make them immune from being charged with a crime, and it certainly does not make them immune from the legislator’s rules.

Besides, Sutton hasn't been arrested, the Senate is asking the question of whether or not he violated Senate rules.

So nice try on the spin, but your poor attempt is exposed.
Anonymous said…
It's not a spin, it's a question. I recognize that there is no immunity, but this has been pending for 11 months and no charges have been filed, nor arrests made. My question stands. You attempt to distredit it is the spin part, if you look at it reasonably 6:59
Anonymous said…
Bill makes a point but, there is a difference here imho. The difference is "Senate Rules" vs civilian law, I think.

All the Senate can do is question if Senate Rules were broken. Then the Senate can choose to take action or not within their limits.

Does this apply to Hunt? Well, maybe so, have to check the law or a lawyer.

I just wish it didn't take so long for law enforcement to do their duty.

I do agree that care has to be given in the Sutton matter. Let's face it damage has been done to more than one person.

Lets face it sometimes we are blown away by the actions of people we never thought would do a certain act.

I am not saying there is quilt here at all. That is what due process is for.

I just think we all need to remember that there is a difference in what I am calling legislative process vs civilian legal process to a point. do you know what i mean?

The thing is; written rules should have been in place. We just did not have a ethics committee for SD. Sometimes what one person calls common sense is not common sense to another, sad but true.

Regardless if the page was 18 he is still a high school student and I think the law would see him as a student in this matter. But I am not a lawyer. If i was a legislator I would see him as a student since he was in the program.

One question does the program have a age cut off regardless of year in High School?
Anonymous said…
Can anyone speak to the issue of jurisdiction re: criminal charges? I heard today that Larry Long may be getting a bum rap for letting this go on so long without filing charges. The person who made this claim said it was never up to LL to file charges, but rather up to the State's Attorney serving the county where the alleged crime took place. Does anybody know?
Anonymous said…
I don't have insider knowledge, but generally it is true that the state's attorney, and not the AG files charges
Anonymous said…
The local SA and the AG have concurrent jurisdiction meaning either could bring a charge.

Popular posts from this blog

Breaking News: Frederick not in SDGOP Chair Race

A strategic move by Sutton. Good for him, bad for Dems.