It's about health, not potential promiscuity.
As the only South Dakota blogger out with 5 daughters, I feel I need to weigh in on the whole discussion that's occurring with regards to the HPV vaccine, and Governor Rounds' proposal to make it available. My family (including my three oldest girls) watched my mom, their grandmother, succumb slowly and painfully to cancer which spread throughout her body. If a similar fate from a different type of cancer was preventable through a simple shot, why wouldn't anyone advocate for it? At the age most of my kids are going to be getting it, they're still playing with barbies, and negative influences such as most of the programming on MTV, and other assorted trashy television is verboten in my house. All they're going to know about this vaccination is that it's a shot, just like for teatnus or measles. They'll go "Ow, I don't want a shot," and that will be it. Just another mark on their vaccination record. One check box for DPT, one for HPV, and so on...
Comments
IMHO, the topic is directed towards the Rapid Mayor's race.
I have to admit that I am curious what the others spent.
I just may have to look it up if their reports are in.
I guess wierdness in RC politics is nothing new - it's been going on for years.
Just imagine all of the madcap adventures when RC has a new mayor doling out the patronage.
I will try to shed some light on the Schumacher/Rollinger entry.
This is yet another amendment to a previous report, Rollinger ran for a city council seat one year ago and he was defeated by L. Lacroix.
I can only assume Hamilton and Schumacher are having trouble keeping track of what lies they told to whom, this is from the same election that they shifted money to say Schumacher helped Kooiker, which he didnt.
this makes like 3-4 changes concerning that election and Hamiltons PAC,,, you gotta wonder how many changes before they get it right ?
It does not appear to be an amendment. I am saying it should have been an amendment. As I understand it, donations and expenses are for a particular campaign, or, for specific periods of time. The payment to Rollinger was for a period of time or election in the past, therefore, tht expenditure should have been reported as an amendment. If Hamiltons PAC had this much trouble with one election, maybe, the SOS should take a closer look ?