Breaking News - Latterell versus Sutton, Part II

By -
BREAKING NEWS - I just heard that the news coming out of Aberdeen today is that there was a rematch between Isaac Latterell and Duane Sutton. The race this time? Brown County GOP Chairman.

And guess who came out on top?

Now two for two, I hear that Isaac had strong support from those in attendance. The big surprise is that he had no idea that he'd be facing his former primary opponent. A different opponent was anticipated. But the name that was placed in nomination was Duane Sutton.

Shades of a 2008 race to come? We'll have to wait and see if there's a third rematch.

Comments

Anonymous said…
"The Sutton's=Liberals
8:40 PM
Anonymous said…
Isaac is da bomb!
8:57 PM
Anonymous said…
Go Isaac!
9:44 PM
Anonymous said…
Sutton, isnt that not us backwards
10:17 PM
Anonymous said…
No actually it isn't.
10:56 PM
Anonymous said…
Yes! Way to go Latterell!
12:36 AM
Anonymous said…
PP--WHY in the world are you not covering the other Sutton?? That is one of the biggest stories in South Dakota history and you are not covering it??? Some of your faithful readers are wondering what is going on here...we have been reading your blog for some time now during this entire saga and now you go cold?? Oh...and please do some checking...if I'm not mistaken Rep. Roger Hunt is on the committee to make up rules against Sutton??? That is just a thorn in my side!! Please let me know if that is correct information or not, because if it is...IT NEEDS TO BE COVERED!!! Hunt is ALSO under investigation RIGHT?????? But maybe the powers that be in Pierre only want to discipline one of their members...UNBELIEVABLE!!!!
8:38 AM
PP said…
Anon 8:42 posted, but I had to redact a bit from....



Sorry PP--while I was posting here, you were uploading the top story...And YES your info on [redacted] is correct. I believe they paid fines yesterday...so it should be public record now...Don't forget to get back to me about HUNT!!! I will post up top as soon as you open it for comments!! I want to know if the people that represent us as a whole are going to treat ALL members fairly or are out to get just ONE!!
11:46 AM
PP said…
8:38/8:42, I'll comment when we actually know whether or not something illegal happened.

Right now, we're awaiting a declaratory judgement from the court as to if Roger actually found a clever loophole, or definitively violated the law.

At least give him the same benefit of the doubt as Senator Sutton. Even with Dan, they're only allegations at this point.
11:57 AM
Anonymous said…
The thumb rises!
8:34 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A note from Benedict Ar... Sorry. A note from Stan Adelstein why he thinks you should vote Democrat this year.

By -
Image
(Click on letter to enlarge) And while it may not be printed at taxpayer expense, I don't see a disclaimer, either. When they hold the special session (supposedly at the end of November) , since he's left them already, I think his colleagues should expel him from the caucus. Sure. At that point it's only going to be symbolic. But since he's already said he's running again in the near future, sometimes symbolism is enough.
Read more

Corson County information on Klaudt Rape Charges

By -
Here's some of the information on the Corson County Charges: COUNT I That on or about December of 2005, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration with his foster daughter, A.M., through the use of force or coercion; and as to COUNT II That on or about July or August of 2006, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration with his foster daughter, A.M., through the use of force or coercion; and as to COUNT III That on or about July or August of 2006, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration, separate and distinct from the act alleged in Count II, with
Read more

It's about health, not potential promiscuity.

By -
As the only South Dakota blogger out with 5 daughters, I feel I need to weigh in on the whole discussion that's occurring with regards to the HPV vaccine, and Governor Rounds' proposal to make it available. My family (including my three oldest girls) watched my mom, their grandmother, succumb slowly and painfully to cancer which spread throughout her body. If a similar fate from a different type of cancer was preventable through a simple shot, why wouldn't anyone advocate for it? At the age most of my kids are going to be getting it, they're still playing with barbies, and negative influences such as most of the programming on MTV, and other assorted trashy television is verboten in my house. All they're going to know about this vaccination is that it's a shot, just like for teatnus or measles. They'll go "Ow, I don't want a shot," and that will be it. Just another mark on their vaccination record. One check box for DPT, one for HPV, and so on
Read more