enough said.

By -

Comments

Anonymous said…
hilarious!

How about a "legislation for dummies"? The current legislature could use a copy.
6:37 PM
Anonymous said…
How do I define "dummy"?

Claim you are a South Dakota campaign and not from California,

but...

your publicity person is from California,

your web server is in Louisiana

you write letters to the editor about police corruption in Tacoma,

and your website talks about corrupt judges in California, Ohio and South Carolin.

Notice there's nothing South Dakota about any of this?
9:05 PM
Anonymous said…
One more thing: the California judicial corruption case Amendmente.com is using on their website? It's from 1996.
9:09 PM
Anonymous said…
I hope everyone out there, no matter which side you're on, has enough sense not to sign the referendum petition on HB 1215 (the abortion ban). It's going to be challenged in court anyway. Does anyone want to hear non-stop ads on the subject all summer and fall? Plus all the wasted money, all because a few wackos are so obsessed with their "right" to kill children.
11:26 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Corson County information on Klaudt Rape Charges

By -
Here's some of the information on the Corson County Charges: COUNT I That on or about December of 2005, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration with his foster daughter, A.M., through the use of force or coercion; and as to COUNT II That on or about July or August of 2006, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration with his foster daughter, A.M., through the use of force or coercion; and as to COUNT III That on or about July or August of 2006, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration, separate and distinct from the act alleged in Count II, with...
Read more

It's about health, not potential promiscuity.

By -
As the only South Dakota blogger out with 5 daughters, I feel I need to weigh in on the whole discussion that's occurring with regards to the HPV vaccine, and Governor Rounds' proposal to make it available. My family (including my three oldest girls) watched my mom, their grandmother, succumb slowly and painfully to cancer which spread throughout her body. If a similar fate from a different type of cancer was preventable through a simple shot, why wouldn't anyone advocate for it? At the age most of my kids are going to be getting it, they're still playing with barbies, and negative influences such as most of the programming on MTV, and other assorted trashy television is verboten in my house. All they're going to know about this vaccination is that it's a shot, just like for teatnus or measles. They'll go "Ow, I don't want a shot," and that will be it. Just another mark on their vaccination record. One check box for DPT, one for HPV, and so on...
Read more

Is the first "dog of war" a poodle? The Sutton team unleashes an injunction.

By -
After promising to unleash the dogs of war on to the Senate should they proceed with a hearing, the Sutton defense team struck first with an injunction trying to prevent the hearing from going forward. As related at ArgusLeader.com tonight, things are now on hold in the Senate: A judge has ordered the Senate to put on hold a hearing to decide whether to remove Sen. Dan Sutton of Flandreau, who has been accused of groping a legislative page a year ago. Judge Dave Gienapp of Moody County signed the order, obstained late today by the Argus Leader. Patrick Duffy, one of Sutton's lawyers, had asked for the ruling today. Duffy said the Senate does not have the right, constitutionally, to force Sutton to leave office by holding the hearing that it had planned. The hearing was to start as soon next week. The judge will hear arguments in the case at 9 a.m. Jan. 19 in Flandreau. Sutton has not spoken at length about the issue, but his lawyers have maintained his innocence. Asked about the ...
Read more