Now that's the understatement of the year.

By -
Posting has been light tonight, as I've been torturing myself listening to Bill Stegmeier podcast interviews to see what I can glean.

Ugh. 2-3 hours of paranoia about judges and bankers and insurance companies walking hand in hand, and Bill talking about his seeing his poor friend (the one who refused to pay taxes and threatened to kill a judge) "railroaded" by the guv'mint.

There was kind of a "no sh*t, Sherlock" moment that struck me as mildy funny. But it quickly goes back into the anti-judge paranoia that is Amendment E. Listen to it here as the host of "The Common Sense Coalition" Derry Brownfield points out the fact that if Stegmeier's measure is challenged, it will go in front of the same judges he's going after:
Derry: It's going to challenged in a court of judges that hate you to start with.

BS: er... yah.
Of course, BS thinks everyone will rise up in protest. Somehow, I sincerely doubt it.

Oh, and aside from convicted felon Gene Lodermeier, they're still lacking a SD case that anyone will swallow. I'll have to post the clip where BS & Zerman practically choke over answering that one.

- I also noticed tonight that the head of the Judicial Accountability movement in Georgia, Ed Strange, took a moment away from penning a love letter to his first cousin (or whatever anti-guv'mint types do down South) and compared me to Hitler.

Comments

Haggs said…
Way to take one for the team, PP. I know I wouldn't be able to sit through hours of listening to those clowns.
5:34 AM
Anonymous said…
What I cannot understand is if Stegmeier supposedly left his two star JAILer in Chief title and Branson, why is it that Branson and other JAILers like Ed Strange are coming out of the wood work helping him at that site you linked to.
6:13 AM
Anonymous said…
What I don't understand is all the anti-americanism shown by you bloggers...Did it ever occur to yous guys that Cali is a state in AMERICA? Who cares who supports Amendment E, next you'll be saying that Bill Stegmeier is a member of Al-quaida
10:59 AM
PP said…
Really anon 10:59? I didn't think they taught geography in the New World Order Schools.

Regardless, if it's such a peachy keen idea, then let Ron Branson try it in his own backyard before he exports it to SD.

Oh, that's right - he couldn't get it on the ballot there.
12:23 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A note from Benedict Ar... Sorry. A note from Stan Adelstein why he thinks you should vote Democrat this year.

By -
Image
(Click on letter to enlarge) And while it may not be printed at taxpayer expense, I don't see a disclaimer, either. When they hold the special session (supposedly at the end of November) , since he's left them already, I think his colleagues should expel him from the caucus. Sure. At that point it's only going to be symbolic. But since he's already said he's running again in the near future, sometimes symbolism is enough.
Read more

Corson County information on Klaudt Rape Charges

By -
Here's some of the information on the Corson County Charges: COUNT I That on or about December of 2005, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration with his foster daughter, A.M., through the use of force or coercion; and as to COUNT II That on or about July or August of 2006, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration with his foster daughter, A.M., through the use of force or coercion; and as to COUNT III That on or about July or August of 2006, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration, separate and distinct from the act alleged in Count II, with
Read more

It's about health, not potential promiscuity.

By -
As the only South Dakota blogger out with 5 daughters, I feel I need to weigh in on the whole discussion that's occurring with regards to the HPV vaccine, and Governor Rounds' proposal to make it available. My family (including my three oldest girls) watched my mom, their grandmother, succumb slowly and painfully to cancer which spread throughout her body. If a similar fate from a different type of cancer was preventable through a simple shot, why wouldn't anyone advocate for it? At the age most of my kids are going to be getting it, they're still playing with barbies, and negative influences such as most of the programming on MTV, and other assorted trashy television is verboten in my house. All they're going to know about this vaccination is that it's a shot, just like for teatnus or measles. They'll go "Ow, I don't want a shot," and that will be it. Just another mark on their vaccination record. One check box for DPT, one for HPV, and so on
Read more