One vote on deck for South Dakotans' view on immigration, Herseth Sandlin votes NO.
The Tancredo amendment yesterday to ban Homeland Security funding from cities that are sanctuaries for illegals was one of the first recent tests on where our congresspeople stand on immigration.
And guess where South Dakota's very own was on the measure after her previous statements to protect the needs of dairy farmers to hire illegals (!?!).
And guess where South Dakota's very own was on the measure after her previous statements to protect the needs of dairy farmers to hire illegals (!?!).
Comments
You're a true Republican, Powers, a true conserative.
oh yeah, I forgot, they protect her and make sure she never get bad press because all the reporters are liberals. how could i forget.
In fact, here is a list of "known" santuary cities * you'll want to avoid:
Anchorage, Alaska
Fairbanks, Alaska
Chandler, Arizona
Fresno, California
Los Angeles, California
San Diego, California
San Francisco, California
Sonoma County, California
Evanston, Illinois
Cicero, Illinois
Cambridge, Massachusetts
Orleans, Massachusetts
Portland, Maine
Baltimore, Maryland
Takoma Park, Maryland
Ann Arbor, Michigan
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Durham, North Carolina
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Aztec, New Mexico
Rio Arriba County, New Mexico
Sante Fe, New Mexico
New York, New York
Ashland, Oregon
Gaston, Oregon
Marion County, Oregon
Austin, Texas
Houston, Texas
Katy, Texas
Seattle, Washington
Madison, Wisconsin
Happy travels, you goofballs.
* source:
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=20547
Do you need permission from Pat to go to the bathroom?
What are you, a sheep?
Anyway, Herseth supports illegal immigration because she's a Dem. If you want to use your characterization of sheep, then she's a perfect example of following her leader Pelosi.
It's a completely cut and dry issue. Clearly, Herseth-Sandlin voted against the amendment because she wants to "open the floodgates" so to speak. Clearly, this was the defining vote on her views on immigration...she couldn't possibly have voted against it on the basis that it's a bad idea.
Nope. Not at all.
< /sarcasm >