3 TV Commercials from the No on Amendment E People

By -
There are three new television commercials for the "No on Amendment E" campaign and you're seeing them here for the first time!



"Parole Board #2"




"Parole Board"




and "Empty Meetings" - This one is my favorite!

Comments

Anonymous said…
Those aired last week in the Sioux Falls area.
5:18 PM
PP said…
ok, maybe for the second time. (Sorry, I hadn't seen them)
5:23 PM
Anonymous said…
Shuold work disclaimers not SD compliant. shortest character 20 lines hi that's why uppercase

may have to rework
5:35 PM
Anonymous said…
When is Allen Unruh going to come out with his commercial supporting Amendment E?
6:17 PM
Anonymous said…
Even the Argus Leader said the radio commericals were dumb.

Can No On E get their money back?

fyi...the media bias is now documented on www.AmendmentE.com
7:08 PM
Anonymous said…
Sounds like someone at Vote yes on Amendment E is a little biased.
8:08 PM
Anonymous said…
Someone indulge me please (and no I'm not an E supporter) :

Is a parole board hearing judicial in nature? Is it not an executive function?
8:36 PM
Anonymous said…
Sentencing has always been a judicial function. The amendment refers to "quasi-judicial" powers - this is an ill-defined term that is subject to broad interpretation.
9:22 PM
Anonymous said…
Here's the deal, though. These ads are rediculously sensational. It's a turn off. It's a fear tactic.

It's contrived. But, it will probably scare old people.
1:06 AM
Anonymous said…
I'm not even that old, and I just pooped myself
7:33 AM
Anonymous said…
I am disappointed with the NO on E campaign. Most of their stuff is cheesy and overly dramatic. Why not give us some meat and potatoes information rather than the unshaven convict? Fortunately the JAIL nuts don't have enough money to mount a formidable campaign.
9:22 AM
Anonymous said…
Better yet, why not just show footage of Bill Steigmaier or Ron Branson speaking about the issue?

That is a sure fire way to get people to vote against it.
12:28 PM
Anonymous said…
These ads dramatize the truth. It's no coincidence that several ex-cons have sent in letters to the editor in support of this E-Lunacy. Gene Lodermeier? You kiddin' me? "hey Geno, since you got out, you seen your wife lately, you know , the one that went missing twenty years ago and still hasnt been found?"

(thanks argus for making sure the VOICES of such men have a place in our society.)
6:15 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A note from Benedict Ar... Sorry. A note from Stan Adelstein why he thinks you should vote Democrat this year.

By -
Image
(Click on letter to enlarge) And while it may not be printed at taxpayer expense, I don't see a disclaimer, either. When they hold the special session (supposedly at the end of November) , since he's left them already, I think his colleagues should expel him from the caucus. Sure. At that point it's only going to be symbolic. But since he's already said he's running again in the near future, sometimes symbolism is enough.
Read more

Corson County information on Klaudt Rape Charges

By -
Here's some of the information on the Corson County Charges: COUNT I That on or about December of 2005, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration with his foster daughter, A.M., through the use of force or coercion; and as to COUNT II That on or about July or August of 2006, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration with his foster daughter, A.M., through the use of force or coercion; and as to COUNT III That on or about July or August of 2006, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration, separate and distinct from the act alleged in Count II, with...
Read more

It's about health, not potential promiscuity.

By -
As the only South Dakota blogger out with 5 daughters, I feel I need to weigh in on the whole discussion that's occurring with regards to the HPV vaccine, and Governor Rounds' proposal to make it available. My family (including my three oldest girls) watched my mom, their grandmother, succumb slowly and painfully to cancer which spread throughout her body. If a similar fate from a different type of cancer was preventable through a simple shot, why wouldn't anyone advocate for it? At the age most of my kids are going to be getting it, they're still playing with barbies, and negative influences such as most of the programming on MTV, and other assorted trashy television is verboten in my house. All they're going to know about this vaccination is that it's a shot, just like for teatnus or measles. They'll go "Ow, I don't want a shot," and that will be it. Just another mark on their vaccination record. One check box for DPT, one for HPV, and so on...
Read more