Forward South Dakota's New TV Commercial

By -


Well. If they want to stop the lies, why don't they start by telling South Dakotans who is paying for their campaign.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

KSFY: Advance copy of abortion measure in hand

By -
KSFY is announcing that they have an advance copy of the abortion measure in hand and are giving details on what it contains:
The new bill says if a woman's life is in danger, or she is a victim of rape or incest, an abortion can be performed upon certain conditions. Specifically, the bill says if a doctor determines the pregnancy has put a woman's life in danger and another doctor agrees with the assessment, an abortion can be performed. In a case of rape or incest, the crime must be reported within 50 days of the event. An abortion could then be performed no later than 17 weeks into the pregnancy in both cases.and...

A source tells KSFY there are 25 sponsors of the bill, but there is no prime sponsor, it's a group effort.You can read that all here, but that last line is complete BS. SOMEONE is going to have to put their name on the line as the prime sponsor of the measure.

Despite Gordon Howie being the likely person whose name is going to be on the line, I'm told that …
Read more

Wikipedia strikes again. Not Stephanie, but the Argus gets it this time.

By -
Check this out - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argus_Leader:
ControversyIn March of 2006, the Argus Leader came under fire for attempting to control distribution rights within the city of Sioux Falls.The Argus Leader through a subsidiary company, News Center Distribution (NCD), had local businesses sign contracts saying that the Argus Leader controlled the publications to be distributed in their businesses. [2]The agreement allowed the Argus Leader to display and give away its free publications like Live, PetMag and City Style. Other independent publishers such as Prime, Renter's Guide, the Shopping News and others would have to pay the Argus Leader a fee to distribute their publications.But if the independent publishers didn't pay the Argus Leader, they threatened to physically take their competitors magazines out of contracted businesses.The Argus Leader’s move was viewed as a violation on First Amendment rights after they gained exclusive contracts to control distribution on …
Read more