Gov Staffer leaves to go to TSD

By -
I missed this one until now. Kim Olson, wife of Representative Ryan Olson, is moving out of her space in the Governor's office and taking up residence at the Department of Tourism and State Development:
Kim (Juffer) Olson has been named the state’s Economic Development Director and the Deputy Secretary of the Department of Tourism and State Development, Richard Benda, Secretary of Tourism and State Development announced today, May 29, 2007. Olson currently serves as a Senior Policy Advisor to Governor Mike Rounds.
“Kim has been working as the Department’s liaison with the Governor’s Office for the past several years so this is a natural transition for her,” Benda said. “Kim is already up to speed on the majority of our economic development projects so she will literally be able to hit the ground running,” he said.
and...
Olson, her husband Ryan, and their daughter Olivia live on a farm outside of Onida.
Read it all here.

Kim was always a pleasure to work with in the Governor's office during my time there, and I'm sure she'll do just fine over at TSD. Kim, congrats and good luck from the SDWC.

Comments

Anonymous said…
If Ryan Olson is on the state health plan is that a conflict for him as a legislator??
10:21 AM
Anonymous said…
Good question. I assume his wife is a volunteer since it would be illegal for her, as the spouse of a legislator, to have a contract with the state. I’m certain Mitch Kreps is also a volunteer.
11:04 AM
Anonymous said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
11:11 AM
Anonymous said…
Krebs makes 105,000 per year according to the Argus.
1:51 PM
Anonymous said…
1:51 That simply cannot be. If Krebs made any money from that job, his wife would have a conflict and would not be able to serve in the legislature. I'm sure it is the Argus that is wrong.
1:56 PM
Anonymous said…
The AG has stated that these circumstances are legal. Where the Supreme Court case said (Carol Pitts Case) was no legislator may be employed or under contract (which doesn't include insurance coverage by the way)and that spouses are exempt. If you wanted to say that anyone with any connection to state funding (schools, universities, state government, contractors, etc, you would expempt half the state.
Congratulations to Kim!
2:02 PM
Anonymous said…
2:02
Thanks for clearing that up. So as long as my spouse deposits the check in our account, everything is leagle.
2:24 PM
Anonymous said…
or rather "legal"
2:25 PM
Anonymous said…
And Klaudt was getting paid to take care of foster kids while he held considerable power over the budget for those agencies.

An AG opinion is just that. An opinion.
6:07 PM
Anonymous said…
Legislators aren't on the state health plan. That's why they constantly attack it.
6:14 PM
Anonymous said…
Where is the AG statement in the press calling attention to yet another obvious conflict of interest by a GIP legislator? Where's the conflict statement on Shantel Krebs???? Why is Roger Hunt running loose? Why is child molester Jabba Klaudt running loose?

What is taking Larry so LLLLLooooooooooooonnnnnnnnggggggggg?
6:33 PM
Anonymous said…
Kim will do very well. Good pick.
7:56 PM
Anonymous said…
Who's filling her spot at the Gov's office?
10:00 PM
Anonymous said…
Who is Kim's husband going to offer to debate next? Obama? Gov. Heidepreim or Lt. Gov Turbak (God forbid).
10:01 PM
Anonymous said…
A big part of the problem with state government is the appointment of unqualified, inexperienced, politically-connected people to run agencies and divisions.

We'd be much better served doing a nationwide search for important positions like this one - similar to what the colleges do to pick college presidents. Then, bring in the political animals as underlings.

People who learned everything they know in Pierre, don't really know that much.
12:36 AM
Anonymous said…
12:36,

Thanks for saying that anyone from South Dakota is an idiot! We all really appreciate your comments O wise one. Any other great advice for us podunks here in South Dakota?
7:26 AM
Anonymous said…
Hey Nemec,

Since you are such a constitutional scholar, why don't you give us your opinion of what Article III § 12 of our constitution means?

In the words of its maker(Kellam), the object of Article III § 12 is “to put the Legislature under such limitation of power that they could not create offices for themselves.”

You really want to make an assertion that a spouse of a legislator who holds a position that was long ago created is in violation?
8:36 AM
Anonymous said…
The inbred Pierre crowd is again attempting to defend corruption and cronyism. These examples are great examples of the problem with Pierre. There is truly no one minding the store.
9:01 AM
Anonymous said…
7:26, South Dakota has its idiots like anywhere else - including you (Mr. Olson I presume).

If we don't look for the best people we won't find the best people. This particular job search started and finished with an unqualified, inexperienced, politically-connected person. Just more of the same in Pierre.
10:05 AM
Anonymous said…
Look at her husbands voting record and you know where all of the experience and the brians come from.
4:30 PM
Anonymous said…
Did she approve the Taco John's tourism brochure?
11:54 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A note from Benedict Ar... Sorry. A note from Stan Adelstein why he thinks you should vote Democrat this year.

By -
Image
(Click on letter to enlarge) And while it may not be printed at taxpayer expense, I don't see a disclaimer, either. When they hold the special session (supposedly at the end of November) , since he's left them already, I think his colleagues should expel him from the caucus. Sure. At that point it's only going to be symbolic. But since he's already said he's running again in the near future, sometimes symbolism is enough.
Read more

Corson County information on Klaudt Rape Charges

By -
Here's some of the information on the Corson County Charges: COUNT I That on or about December of 2005, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration with his foster daughter, A.M., through the use of force or coercion; and as to COUNT II That on or about July or August of 2006, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration with his foster daughter, A.M., through the use of force or coercion; and as to COUNT III That on or about July or August of 2006, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration, separate and distinct from the act alleged in Count II, with
Read more

It's about health, not potential promiscuity.

By -
As the only South Dakota blogger out with 5 daughters, I feel I need to weigh in on the whole discussion that's occurring with regards to the HPV vaccine, and Governor Rounds' proposal to make it available. My family (including my three oldest girls) watched my mom, their grandmother, succumb slowly and painfully to cancer which spread throughout her body. If a similar fate from a different type of cancer was preventable through a simple shot, why wouldn't anyone advocate for it? At the age most of my kids are going to be getting it, they're still playing with barbies, and negative influences such as most of the programming on MTV, and other assorted trashy television is verboten in my house. All they're going to know about this vaccination is that it's a shot, just like for teatnus or measles. They'll go "Ow, I don't want a shot," and that will be it. Just another mark on their vaccination record. One check box for DPT, one for HPV, and so on
Read more