Amendment E's spokesperson better order a thicker skin with his next assault rifle.

By -
Tim over at A Progressive on the Prairie takes note tonight of a recent request of the Amendment E spokesman Jake Hanes.

Apparently, for someone who is representing a group calling judges and public officials corrupt, he can't take it when the spotlight is turned on him. On the MySpace group " Survivalists against the NWO" he's posted an open request for his cronies to "Blog the sh*t out of this guy," in response to Tim's posting of photos on Jake's website Jake toting an automatic weapon and talking about "getting ready" for a domestic war.

Just remember, the new face of Amendment E. Just as questionable as the old one.

Comments

Anonymous said…
PP:

I originally caught it on education TV in Rapid City (and there's a link to it on Tim's web site), but this Jake Haynes cat went before the Rapid City Board of Education to testify against a resolution against Amendment E.

The thing that struck me is that Jake Haynes has been involved with the JAIL movement in other states and he's actively involved in the South Dakota Campaign.

However, before the school board, he didn't identify himself as being involved with the amendment. He said he was a "concerned citizen" from Sioux Falls. He didn't lie, but he wasn't being truthful.

Going back to the Legislature, the people for Amendment E have not made any attempt to be immediately open and honest - they delay answering questions, and they hide their true affiliations.

And they are ASKING for accountability.

Wow.
9:51 PM
PP said…
Brian - any info on those other states? Inquiring minds want to know!
10:46 PM
Anonymous said…
For the record, I was present when the picture was taken, and there was a WAR that evening where several of us suffered burns on our hands from the bottle rockets and fire crackers. Funny how you guys like to spin things to harm a good man. We're all behind you Jake!
RMS employees
11:03 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A note from Benedict Ar... Sorry. A note from Stan Adelstein why he thinks you should vote Democrat this year.

By -
Image
(Click on letter to enlarge) And while it may not be printed at taxpayer expense, I don't see a disclaimer, either. When they hold the special session (supposedly at the end of November) , since he's left them already, I think his colleagues should expel him from the caucus. Sure. At that point it's only going to be symbolic. But since he's already said he's running again in the near future, sometimes symbolism is enough.
Read more

Corson County information on Klaudt Rape Charges

By -
Here's some of the information on the Corson County Charges: COUNT I That on or about December of 2005, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration with his foster daughter, A.M., through the use of force or coercion; and as to COUNT II That on or about July or August of 2006, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration with his foster daughter, A.M., through the use of force or coercion; and as to COUNT III That on or about July or August of 2006, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration, separate and distinct from the act alleged in Count II, with
Read more

It's about health, not potential promiscuity.

By -
As the only South Dakota blogger out with 5 daughters, I feel I need to weigh in on the whole discussion that's occurring with regards to the HPV vaccine, and Governor Rounds' proposal to make it available. My family (including my three oldest girls) watched my mom, their grandmother, succumb slowly and painfully to cancer which spread throughout her body. If a similar fate from a different type of cancer was preventable through a simple shot, why wouldn't anyone advocate for it? At the age most of my kids are going to be getting it, they're still playing with barbies, and negative influences such as most of the programming on MTV, and other assorted trashy television is verboten in my house. All they're going to know about this vaccination is that it's a shot, just like for teatnus or measles. They'll go "Ow, I don't want a shot," and that will be it. Just another mark on their vaccination record. One check box for DPT, one for HPV, and so on
Read more