I admit it. PP is a lawbreaker

By -
I read an article tonight at Rapidcityjournal.com with some personal interest. Because apparently I, my dad, and a couple of family friends might not have been entirely within the law with an action we took a few years back:
South Dakota law, 34-26A-24 and 34-26A-27, speak only of permission to scatter human cremains over the sea and public waterways in the state, as well as on private land by consent of the landowner. Since there is precious little ocean in South Dakota, Jay Alderman, chief deputy of the Pennington County state’s attorney civil department, said he thinks the Legislature’s intent was to allow it to be done only in streams, lakes and other public waters, not on public land. “I see no reference in statute that allows it on land,” Alderman said.

In 2000, the Legislature amended the law to make it a Class 2 misdemeanor if people fail to file, with the nearest county Register of Deeds office, a verified statement that includes the name of the deceased, the time and place of death, and the place that the ashes will be scattered.

Spokespersons in both the Lawrence County and Pennington County Register of Deeds offices could not remember anyone ever filing such a form. Alderman said that to his knowledge, no one has ever been prosecuted for failing to do so in Pennington County.
Read that all here.

I found out rather quickly that the parish priest didn't want to know what intentions we had for my mom's remains. (It must have been him covering his ears and going "LA LA LA I can't hear you.") But I had no idea that we might be contravening South Dakota law, either.

Technically, when we spread my mom's cremains, I think we might have been at the edge of a South Dakota waterway. But I guarantee you we didn't file some stupid bureaucratic form.

For those who choose to spread the ashes of their loved ones on public grounds, it's not because they just want a place to dump them. It's because those people cherished those lands, and the experiences that they had on them.

If there ever was a law that should come off of the books, this would be a great one to repeal. Why discourage people to show love for the land?

Comments

Anonymous said…
The whole of State guvernmint is compost of law breakers.

southdakotagov.info

What goes around comes around.
1:45 AM
Anonymous said…
Compost of law breakers? I bet that's covered under those same statutes.
7:32 AM
PP said…
Considering that website was one of the JAIL supporters, I'm not surprised they're spelling government as if they reside in a trailer park.
7:39 AM
Anonymous said…
If there ever was a law that should come off of the books, this would be a great one to repeal. Why discourage people to show love for the land?

Improper disposal of a dead body was a common law offense for centuries. This is a stauatory extension of that rule. Why is it a crime to improperly dispose of a dead body? Variety of reasons. Public health for one. Assurance the disposal is not to cover up a crime another.

Note that this does NOT prohibit the distribution of the ashes only that, consistent with centuries of common law and decades of statuatory criminal law, the final resting place of a body (or ashes) be determined and recorded.
8:51 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A note from Benedict Ar... Sorry. A note from Stan Adelstein why he thinks you should vote Democrat this year.

By -
Image
(Click on letter to enlarge) And while it may not be printed at taxpayer expense, I don't see a disclaimer, either. When they hold the special session (supposedly at the end of November) , since he's left them already, I think his colleagues should expel him from the caucus. Sure. At that point it's only going to be symbolic. But since he's already said he's running again in the near future, sometimes symbolism is enough.
Read more

Corson County information on Klaudt Rape Charges

By -
Here's some of the information on the Corson County Charges: COUNT I That on or about December of 2005, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration with his foster daughter, A.M., through the use of force or coercion; and as to COUNT II That on or about July or August of 2006, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration with his foster daughter, A.M., through the use of force or coercion; and as to COUNT III That on or about July or August of 2006, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration, separate and distinct from the act alleged in Count II, with
Read more

It's about health, not potential promiscuity.

By -
As the only South Dakota blogger out with 5 daughters, I feel I need to weigh in on the whole discussion that's occurring with regards to the HPV vaccine, and Governor Rounds' proposal to make it available. My family (including my three oldest girls) watched my mom, their grandmother, succumb slowly and painfully to cancer which spread throughout her body. If a similar fate from a different type of cancer was preventable through a simple shot, why wouldn't anyone advocate for it? At the age most of my kids are going to be getting it, they're still playing with barbies, and negative influences such as most of the programming on MTV, and other assorted trashy television is verboten in my house. All they're going to know about this vaccination is that it's a shot, just like for teatnus or measles. They'll go "Ow, I don't want a shot," and that will be it. Just another mark on their vaccination record. One check box for DPT, one for HPV, and so on
Read more