Audioblog for 7/23/05
Don't try to spank your opponent, before you know whether your candidate has been naughty too.

By -


Music courtesy of http://www.freeplaymusic.com/

Text version:

In 1988, during my tenure with the state party, we had a Democrat who was running for office challenging one of our incumbents, and there supposedly was rumour they had been arrested, tried, and convicted for selling marijuana. A zealous young campaign recruit like myself would normally think, "Oooooo. Silver bullet issue here? Might look like it. The Opponent better get out the butter - because he's toast!"

I researched this issue, and proved every single allegation true. The rare instance where it was documented in a public forum. The rare instance when this stuff actually proved true. I had news clippings from two newspapers, with the name in print and everything. I had the sledgehammer, and I was getting ready to swing!

Before I prepared for the pounce, I noticed that this is the second go around for this pair of candidates. And the conviction was even more recent two years earlier, when they tangled before. So, for once I used my head and asked around - "Why did this never come up during the other election?"

The answer? After about four phone calls, I uncover a startling truth: "Well it was known before, but ______ (my candidate) was on TV when they were interviewing candidates about Presidential candidate drug use, and he (my guy) said it wasn't a big deal. In fact, he admitted that he himself had 'experimented' in college, himself. In fact when he was on TV, it sounded like it was more than just ditch weed."

Oh, crap. Talk about a case of innocense lost. My candidate was not as pure as the driven snow? How dare he! The funny thing was that it was my candidate himself who wanted us to get the information out. I had to explain to him why I wasn't going to touch that one with a ten foot pole.

One of the things you come to realize in working on campaigns is that your guy is as human as the guy on the other side. As such, they all make mistakes. All of them. And the dirt you dig up on the other guy might come back and nip you in the tail too.

If you're going to do opposition research, it's not such bad advice to do a little research on your guy (or yourself if you are the candidate) as well. Tell your opposition researcher to start digging into you own background. Know what you might be hit with before you're hit with it. Know what's out there to find. Because you need to know what issues might bring more problems than than the momentary advantage they are worth.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I must admit this is cool stuff
5:45 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A note from Benedict Ar... Sorry. A note from Stan Adelstein why he thinks you should vote Democrat this year.

By -
Image
(Click on letter to enlarge) And while it may not be printed at taxpayer expense, I don't see a disclaimer, either. When they hold the special session (supposedly at the end of November) , since he's left them already, I think his colleagues should expel him from the caucus. Sure. At that point it's only going to be symbolic. But since he's already said he's running again in the near future, sometimes symbolism is enough.
Read more

Corson County information on Klaudt Rape Charges

By -
Here's some of the information on the Corson County Charges: COUNT I That on or about December of 2005, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration with his foster daughter, A.M., through the use of force or coercion; and as to COUNT II That on or about July or August of 2006, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration with his foster daughter, A.M., through the use of force or coercion; and as to COUNT III That on or about July or August of 2006, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration, separate and distinct from the act alleged in Count II, with
Read more

It's about health, not potential promiscuity.

By -
As the only South Dakota blogger out with 5 daughters, I feel I need to weigh in on the whole discussion that's occurring with regards to the HPV vaccine, and Governor Rounds' proposal to make it available. My family (including my three oldest girls) watched my mom, their grandmother, succumb slowly and painfully to cancer which spread throughout her body. If a similar fate from a different type of cancer was preventable through a simple shot, why wouldn't anyone advocate for it? At the age most of my kids are going to be getting it, they're still playing with barbies, and negative influences such as most of the programming on MTV, and other assorted trashy television is verboten in my house. All they're going to know about this vaccination is that it's a shot, just like for teatnus or measles. They'll go "Ow, I don't want a shot," and that will be it. Just another mark on their vaccination record. One check box for DPT, one for HPV, and so on
Read more