New South Dakota Blog

By -
A new South Dakota Blog has popped up specifically in relation to South Dakota's persistent debate on abortion. http://www.gottahavetruth.blogspot.com/ is currently writing on the HB 1166 lawsuit, and the qualifications of the staff at planned parenthood:

Dr. Van Oppen(who performs abortions on women in South Dakota) states that in
HIS PERSONAL VIEW one isn't a "human being" until the child is "weaned" from his or her mother, often at about the post-natal age of TWO YEARS, but only if the
child's parents consider him or her a human being and welcom the child into the
family of human beings.
Read it all here.

Comments

Anonymous said…
(And we call those grissly butchers "doctors"?)
12:35 PM
Anonymous said…
I think that blog was misnamed. I'm not seeing a lot of truth.
12:48 PM
Anonymous said…
What? Maybe he's the one who isn't a human being even at his advanced age!

Actually, he believes this probably because it makes it easier for him to justify performing abortions and violating his Hippocratic oath.
12:57 PM
Anonymous said…
Tom, please tell us what is not true on that blog site.
1:05 PM
Anonymous said…
Yet another exercise in unrestrained character assassination and lies, the hallmark of the extreme right. I hope they have good legal advice and know the difference between "a public figure" and a private citizen in matters of libel.
7:49 AM
James said…
Tom,
Feel free to point out anything on the site that is false and I can tell you the exact page number that it comes from.

anon,
This is a public document. If you believe I have misquoted anyone please let me know. I copied everything on the site word for word.

There is much more than I have even posted yet, but I don't own a scanner and had already highlighted many parts of the document that it was simple to just type them up on a blog; which was FREE!!

I'm willing to bet that PP will find stuff in there that I haven't seen. I'm just a regular citizen who wants the truth to get out to the general public. The comments made by planned parenthood and their "doctors and experts" are not in touch with what people in South Dakota and America believe.
9:32 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A note from Benedict Ar... Sorry. A note from Stan Adelstein why he thinks you should vote Democrat this year.

By -
Image
(Click on letter to enlarge) And while it may not be printed at taxpayer expense, I don't see a disclaimer, either. When they hold the special session (supposedly at the end of November) , since he's left them already, I think his colleagues should expel him from the caucus. Sure. At that point it's only going to be symbolic. But since he's already said he's running again in the near future, sometimes symbolism is enough.
Read more

Corson County information on Klaudt Rape Charges

By -
Here's some of the information on the Corson County Charges: COUNT I That on or about December of 2005, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration with his foster daughter, A.M., through the use of force or coercion; and as to COUNT II That on or about July or August of 2006, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration with his foster daughter, A.M., through the use of force or coercion; and as to COUNT III That on or about July or August of 2006, in the County of Corson, State of South Dakota, Ted Alvin Klaudt did commit the public offense of SECOND DEGREE RAPE (SDCL 22-22-1(2)) in that he did accomplish an act of sexual penetration, separate and distinct from the act alleged in Count II, with
Read more

It's about health, not potential promiscuity.

By -
As the only South Dakota blogger out with 5 daughters, I feel I need to weigh in on the whole discussion that's occurring with regards to the HPV vaccine, and Governor Rounds' proposal to make it available. My family (including my three oldest girls) watched my mom, their grandmother, succumb slowly and painfully to cancer which spread throughout her body. If a similar fate from a different type of cancer was preventable through a simple shot, why wouldn't anyone advocate for it? At the age most of my kids are going to be getting it, they're still playing with barbies, and negative influences such as most of the programming on MTV, and other assorted trashy television is verboten in my house. All they're going to know about this vaccination is that it's a shot, just like for teatnus or measles. They'll go "Ow, I don't want a shot," and that will be it. Just another mark on their vaccination record. One check box for DPT, one for HPV, and so on
Read more